The European Nucleotide Archive in 2022.

The European Nucleotide Archive (ENA; https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena), maintained by the European Molecular Biology Laboratory's European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), offers those producing data an open and supported platform for the management, archiving, publication, and dissemination of data; and to the scientific community as a whole, it offers a globally comprehensive data set through a host of data discovery and retrieval tools. Here, we describe recent updates to the ENA's submission and retrieval services as well as focused efforts to improve connectivity, reusability, and interoperability of ENA data and metadata.

Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard care for incisional laparotomy subcutaneous wounds in gastrointestinal perforations: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections after gastrointestinal perforation with peritonitis have significant morbidity, increased hospital stays, and cost of treatment. The appropriate management of these wounds is still debatable. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal perforation with peritonitis via midline incision were screened for inclusion. After the closure of the midline fascia, patients were randomized into an open negative pressure wound therapy group (application of negative pressure wound therapy and attempted delayed closure at day 4) or a standard care group (no negative pressure wound therapy and attempted delayed closure at day 4). Postoperative outcomes, including surgical site infection till 30 days, were compared between the groups. This was assessed by an independent assessor not involved in the study for delayed closure. Although a priori sample size was calculated, an interim analysis was performed due to slow recruitment during the COVID pandemic. After interim analysis, a continuation of the trial was deemed unethical and terminated. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were assessed, and 69 were randomized (34 in the negative pressure wound therapy group and 31 in the standard care group). The age, body mass index, comorbidities, blood loss, operative time, and stoma formation were comparable. The surgical site infection was significantly lower in the negative pressure wound therapy group compared to the standard care group (6 [18%] vs 19 [61%], P < .01). The number needed to prevent 1 surgical site infection was 2.3. In a subgroup analysis, the use of negative pressure wound therapy also significantly decreased the rate of surgical site infection in stoma patients (4 [30.7%] vs 9 [69.3%], P = .03). CONCLUSION: Open negative pressure wound therapy significantly decreases the incisional surgical site infection rate in patients with a dirty wound secondary to gastrointestinal perforation with peritonitis.

Objective Evaluation of Olfactory and Taste Dysfunction Among COVID-19 Patients: A Cross Sectional Study from Tribal India.

There is a varying prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction (OTD) in COVID-19 patients, with a higher prevalence reported in the European population as compared to the Asian population. Psychophysical tests are crucial to determine the exact frequency, extent and clinical characteristics of these OTDs. The present study objectively evaluated the OTD for patients treated in the Dedicated COVID-19 Hospital (DCH) in Shahdol. This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted after IEC approval in DCH Shahdol for a period of four months among RT-PCR positive patients, and they were evaluated using validated chemosensitive psychophysical test during ENT consultation to identify OTD. The sample size was calculated as 92 considering prevalence (p) of OTD as 41.3% by applying formula: n = (Z1-a/2)2 × p (1-p) / d 2. The information pertaining to the subjects was kept anonymous and confidential. During data analysis, an association was significant for p value < 0.05. It was observed that 45.5% of subjects reported either loss of taste or smell. During objective evaluation, olfactory and taste dysfunction was observed among 42.4% of subjects (95/224). The Chi-square analysis reflected statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between subjects with OTD and without OTD for the variables such as days from onset of symptoms to admission, and symptoms (fever, sore throat and shortness of breath). Taste and smell are among the important senses and in India they are mostly subjectively evaluated for COVID-19 induced OTD which results in underreporting of these symptoms. So, a gold standard objective evaluation should be taken into consideration to evaluate OTD.

The readiness of the Indian IT middle manager: To lead change as the industry transforms

The global economy has been in a state of disruption brought about mainly by advances in technology. The Indian IT industry is poised to lead this change, given its previous achievement in this area and the country's young, educated population. However, the cost advantage it has thrived on so far is soon waning due to rising talent costs and automation replacing most routine IT work. This calls for a new set of skills that include both tangible technical skills as well as intangible ones such as critical thinking and decision-making, which are currently in short supply in the Indian IT talent market. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated and accelerated this change and raised new talent challenges for Indian IT companies in the form of the necessity to enable remote work quickly, ensure employees wellbeing-both physical and mental-and deal with employees reassessing their what they seek from their employer.The position of the Indian middle manager in these conditions might seem fragile as organizations try to restructure themselves to meet these challenges but research shows that this layer can play a crucial role in keeping workers motivated and engaged, connecting various layers of management and employees, and offering innovative solutions due to their involvement with day-to-day work. But how can it be enabled to drive and nurture this change and play a key role in it? What changes will these professionals need to make to not only survive this transformation but to lead it? (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

A multicenter evaluation of antibacterial use in hospitalized patients through the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic waves.

BACKGROUND: Excessive use of antibiotics has been reported during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We evaluated trends in antibiotic use and culture positive Gram-negative (GN)/Gram-positive (GP) pathogens in US hospitalized patients before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients from 271 US facilities with > 1-day inpatient admission with discharge or death between July 1, 2019, and October 30, 2021, in the BD Insights Research Database. We evaluated microbiological testing data, antibacterial use, defined as antibacterial use ≥ 24 h in admitted patients, and duration of antibacterial therapy. RESULTS: Of 5,518,744 patients included in the analysis, 3,729,295 (67.6%) patients were hospitalized during the pandemic with 2,087,774 (56.0%) tested for SARS-CoV-2 and 189,115 (9.1%) testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. During the pre-pandemic period, 36.2% were prescribed antibacterial therapy and 9.3% tested positive for select GN/GP pathogens. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, antibacterial therapy (57.8%) and positive GN/GP culture (11.9%) were highest in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients followed by SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (antibacterial therapy, 40.1%; GN/GP, pathogens 11.0%), and SARS-CoV-2 not tested (antibacterial therapy 30.4%; GN/GP pathogens 7.2%). Multivariate results showed significant decreases in antibacterial therapy and positive GN/GP cultures for both SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative patients during the pandemic, but no significant overall changes from the pre-pandemic period to the pandemic period. CONCLUSIONS: There was a decline in both antibacterial use and positive GN/GP pathogens in patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. However, overall antibiotic use was similar prior to and during the pandemic. These data may inform future efforts to optimize antimicrobial stewardship and prescribing.

Contact Tracing of Healthcare Workers Exposed to COVID-19 Infection in a Tertiary-Care Hospital: Containing the Contagion.

Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at higher risk of getting infected with COVID-19 infection due to their close proximity to COVID-19-positive patients. We studied the risk stratification and positivity rate in HCWs at risk of getting COVID-19 infection as well as the possible factors responsible for their being at risk of COVID-19 infection during the study period. Material and Methods: This prospective study was conducted after approval by the institutional ethics committee. The data regarding demographic variables, risk stratification, COVID-19 (reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction) report, and possible sources of exposure for HCWs were recorded in a proforma by personal/telephonic interviews as well as from hospital records from March 2020 to June 2021. The data generated were entered into Microsoft Excel® software and analyzed using percentages, proportions, and Chi-square tests for qualitative variables. Results: COVID-19 infection's positivity rate was 19.5% among high-risk and 0.6% among low-risk HCW contacts. HCWs working in non-COVID-19 areas (67.9%) were more at risk than those working in COVID-19 areas (32.1%). In contrast, the COVID-19 positivity rate was significantly higher among high-risk contact HCWs from COVID-19 areas (34.2%) than in non-COVID-19 areas (12.6%). The maximum COVID-19 positivity rate was seen in high-risk contacts with body fluid exposure (21%), performing aerosol-generating procedures (20%), and close exposure in operation theaters (18%). Conclusions: Risk stratification is an important tool to contain infection among HCWs who had unprotected close contact with a COVID-19-positive case. With appropriate contact tracing, we were able to avoid over- and under-quarantine, save many man-hours as well as contain the spread of infection. HCWs should not only wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during work hours but should also practice mask-wearing and social distancing while they are in the community.

A Retrospective Observational Study of Neurological Manifestations in COVID-19 (SON-CoV).

OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has neurologic manifestations associated with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study aimed to retrospectively analyze SARS COVID-19 patients with neurological manifestations and identify patterns of presentation including the site of neuroaxis involvement, neuroimaging, and associated systemic involvement. METHODS AND SUBJECTS: This retrospective observational study was conducted at two tertiary care hospitals in western Rajasthan. Data on age, sex, presenting symptoms, and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, cardiac, cerebrovascular disease, and cancer) were collected from 28th February 2020 to 31st December 2020 through medical records, discharge summaries, and radiological studies. Verbal/written patient consent was obtained due to the prevailing COVID-19 norms at the time of the first wave. Major inclusion criteria were as follows: age >18 years, consent from patient/surrogate, positive RT-PCR report in case of active COVID cases, or positive COVID antibody test in case of post-COVID neurological sequelae. All neurological manifestations were reviewed by at least two neurologists and were divided into central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) manifestations. Systemic features and their temporal relationship with neurological features were recorded. Various other specialized assessments and therapeutic interventions were conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software. A Chi-square test was performed to determine the association between variables. Student's t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used to determine differences in mean values. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean age was 57.32 years for the CNS group and 40 years for the PNS group (p = 0.025). Age was significantly lower in the PNS group than in the CNS group (p = 0.025). Anemia, leucocytosis, and elevated serum creatinine were more commonly seen in the CNS group, although the difference was not statistically significant. The most common CNS manifestations were stroke (41.8%), of which ischemic stroke constituted 83% of cases, followed by seizure (22%), encephalopathy (20.9%), headache (15.1%), and vertigo (3.8%). The most common PNS manifestation was neuropathy (57%), which included Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), critical illness neuropathy, and autonomic neuropathy Conclusion: CNS symptoms of COVID-19 are more common than PNS symptoms. Stroke is the most frequent (46%) COVID-CNS symptom, which occurs in people of age above 35 years and is associated with high mortality.

Virtual Mentoring: A Novel Approach to Facilitate Medical Student Applications to General Surgery Residency.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic rapidly altered the landscape of medical education, particularly disrupting the residency application process and highlighting the need for structured mentorship programs. This prompted our institution to develop a virtual mentoring program to provide tailored, one-on-one mentoring to medical students applying to general surgery residency. The aim of this study was to examine general surgery applicant perception of a pilot virtual mentoring curriculum. DESIGN: The mentorship program included student-tailored mentoring and advising in 5 domains: resume editing, personal statement composition, requesting letters of recommendation, interview skills, and residency program ranking. Electronic surveys were administered following ERAS application submission to participating applicants. The surveys were distributed and collected via a REDCap database. RESULTS: Eighteen out of 19 participants completed the survey. Confidence in a competitive resume (p = 0.006), interview skills (p < 0.001), obtaining letters of recommendation (p = 0.002), personal statement drafting (p < 0.001), and ranking residency programs (p < 0.001) were all significantly improved following completion of the program. Overall utility of the curriculum and likelihood to participate again and recommend the program to others was rated a median 5/5 on the Likert scale (5 [IQR 4-5]). Confidence in the matching carried a premedian 66.5 (50-65) and a postmedian 84 (75-91) (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Following the completion of the virtual mentoring program, participants were found to be more confident in all 5 targeted domains. In addition, they were more confident in their overall ability to match. General Surgery applicants find tailored virtual mentoring programs to be a useful tool allowing for continued program development and expansion.

Morbidity and mortality of hospitalised patients with candidemia during the various severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic waves: A multicentre evaluation of 248 US hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating outcomes of COVID-19 patients with candidemia are limited and have only evaluated a single timepoint during the pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence and outcomes associated with candidemia in patients based on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) status and through the various pandemic waves (1 March 2020-5 March 2022). PATIENTS/METHODS: Multicentre, retrospective cohort analysis of data from 248 US medical facilities using the BD Insights Research Database (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA). Eligible patients were adults aged ≥18 years who were hospitalised for >1 day, had a SARS-CoV-2 test and a positive blood culture for Candida spp. RESULTS: During the study time frame, there were 2,402,879 hospital admissions; 234,903 (9.7%) and 2,167,976 (90.3%) patients were SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative, respectively. A significantly higher rate of candidemia/1000 admissions was observed in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (3.18 vs. 0.99; p < .001). The highest candidemia rate for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients was observed during the Alpha SARS-CoV-2 wave (June 2020-August 2020) with the lowest candidemia rate during the Omicron wave. Hospital mortality was significantly higher in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative patients with candidemia (59.6% vs. 30.8%; p < .001). When evaluating the mortality rate through the various pandemic waves, the rate for the overall population did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates high morbidity and mortality for hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and candidemia which was consistent throughout the pandemic. Patients with COVID-19 are at an increased risk for candidemia; importantly, the magnitude of which may differ based on the circulating variant.

Hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia: An evaluation of predictors and feasibility of benchmarking comparing two risk-adjusted models among 267 hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia (HOB), identify hospital-level predictors, and to evaluate the feasibility of an HOB metric. METHODS: We analyzed 9,202,650 admissions from 267 hospitals during 2015-2020. An HOB event was defined as the first positive blood-culture pathogen on day 3 of admission or later. We used the generalized linear model method via negative binomial regression to identify variables and risk markers for HOB. Standardized infection ratios (SIRs) were calculated based on 2 risk-adjusted models: a simple model using descriptive variables and a complex model using descriptive variables plus additional measures of blood-culture testing practices. Performance of each model was compared against the unadjusted rate of HOB. RESULTS: Overall median rate of HOB per 100 admissions was 0.124 (interquartile range, 0.00-0.22). Facility-level predictors included bed size, sex, ICU admissions, community-onset (CO) blood culture testing intensity, and hospital-onset (HO) testing intensity, and prevalence (all P < .001). In the complex model, CO bacteremia prevalence, HO testing intensity, and HO testing prevalence were the predictors most associated with HOB. The complex model demonstrated better model performance; 55% of hospitals that ranked in the highest quartile based on their raw rate shifted to a lower quartile when the SIR from the complex model was applied. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital descriptors, aggregate patient characteristics, community bacteremia and/or fungemia burden, and clinical blood-culture testing practices influence rates of HOB. Benchmarking an HOB metric is feasible and should endeavor to include both facility and clinical variables.

Clinical features and haematological parameters associated with COVID-19 severity among hospitalized patients: A retrospective observational study from Tribal Central India.

Background: Reports describing demographics, clinical characteristics, hospital course, morbidity, and mortality in patients in the Indian setting have been published, but they are based on limited numbers of cases. The present study among the patients with known outcomes enabled us to better understand the disease process and progression of COVID-19 cases and to correlate the factors affecting the outcome. Methods: This was a record-based, retrospective observational study of patients admitted to COVID-19 Hospital. We have retrieved medical records for all the hospitalized patients with a laboratory confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis with a known outcome (discharged or died) between April 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021. The extracted data included basic demographics, signs and symptoms, duration of hospitalization, and laboratory parameters. Categorical variables were analysed using either the chisquare test or Fisher's exact test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: The mean age of severe and moderate patients was 38.71 years, compared to 34.95 years for mild patients. No gender difference was observed for the severe/moderate, and mild cases. The mortality rate among severe/moderate cases was 11.6%, whereas it was 3.9% in mild patients. Laboratory parameters which were significantly (p < 0.05) raised among the dead compared to discharged patients included CT score, D-dimer, CRP, ALT, AST, and alkaline phosphatase. Conclusion: Clinical and laboratory characteristics reflect the pathophysiology of disease and thus help clinicians recognise the severity of medical illness. They also facilitate the creation of management protocols for clinical care that results in improvement in patient related outcomes.

Preliminary Experience in Post-COVID-19 Mycoses: A Pathologist's Perspective.

Background Coronavirus disease is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-19. Because of co-morbidities and indiscriminate use of steroids and antibiotics, the incidence of opportunistic fungal infections has increased in COVID-affected individuals. Aims and objectives The aim of the study is to analyze the various tissue reaction patterns of COVID-19-associated mucormycosis in the surgical debridement specimens using routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain and special stains like periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), Grocott-Gomori's methenamine silver (GMS), Masson trichrome (MT) and Prussian blue (PB), and to understand the pathogenesis of COVID-19 sequelae. Materials and methods This retrospective observational study was conducted after the approval from the Institute Human Ethical Committee (IHEC) on 45 tissue samples of COVID-associated mucormycosis using routine H&E and histochemical stains such as PAS, GMS, MT, and PB. Detailed demographic profiles, clinical information, radiological findings, and relevant microbiological data in available cases, like reports on potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount preparation, and fungal culture reports on Saboraud's Dextrose Agar (SDA) medium were collected. The different histomorphological tissue reaction patterns were observed and analyzed. Results All the surgical debridement specimens from post-COVID cases had histomorphology of mucormycosis displaying broad, aseptate, ribbon-like fungal hyphae with right-angle branching (45/45). Six of the 45 cases also reveal thin, narrow septate, acute angle branching hyphae, indicating co-existing Aspergillosis (6/45). The histological tissue reaction patterns observed were categorized as extensive tissue necrosis (100%), vascular proliferation (82%), angioinvasion (58%), giant cell reaction (53%), fibrin thrombi (47%), septic thrombi and angiodestruction (40%), fungal osteomyelitis (33%), necrotizing granulomas (31%). Conclusion This study infers that post-COVID-19 associated mucormycosis, alterations in the local tissue microenvironment are found to have a favorable effect on colonizing fungi and result in destructive tissue reactions such as angioinvasion, angiodestruction, necrosis, necrotizing granulomas, suppurative inflammation, and iron pigment deposition. The spectrum of morphological changes reflects the host's immune status.

A Multicenter Comparison of Prevalence and Predictors of Antimicrobial Resistance in Hospitalized Patients Before and During the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Pandemic.

Background: Antibacterial therapy is frequently used in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) without evidence of bacterial infection, prompting concerns about increased antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We evaluated trends in AMR before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis included hospitalized adults aged ≥18 years with >1-day inpatient admission and a record of discharge or death from 271 US facilities in the BD Insights Research Database. We evaluated rates of AMR events, defined as positive cultures for select gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens from any source, with nonsusceptibility reported by commercial panels before (1 July 2019-29 February 2020) and during (1 March 2020-30 October 2021) the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Results: Of 5 518 666 admissions evaluated, AMR rates per 1000 admissions were 35.4 for the prepandemic period and 34.7 for the pandemic period (P ≤ .0001). In the pandemic period, AMR rates per 1000 admissions were 49.2 for SARS-CoV-2-positive admissions, 41.1 for SARS-CoV-2-negative admissions, and 25.7 for patients untested (P ≤ .0001). AMR rates per 1000 admissions among community-onset infections during the pandemic were lower versus prepandemic levels (26.1 vs 27.6; P < .0001), whereas AMR rates for hospital-onset infections were higher (8.6 vs 7.7; P < .0001), driven largely by SARS-CoV-2-positive admissions (21.8). AMR rates were associated with overall antimicrobial use, rates of positive cultures, and higher use of inadequate empiric therapy. Conclusions: Although overall AMR rates did not substantially increase from prepandemic levels, patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection had a significantly higher rate of AMR and hospital-onset infections. Antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship is key to identifying this high-risk AMR population.

Epidemiology and outcomes of culture-positive bloodstream pathogens prior to and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a multicenter evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. We evaluate incidence of community- and hospital-onset BSI rates and outcomes before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients who were hospitalized for ≥ 1 day with discharge or death between June 1, 2019, and September 4, 2021, across 271 US health care facilities. Community- and hospital-onset BSI and related outcomes before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, including intensive care admission rates, and overall and ICU-specific length of stay (LOS) was evaluated. Bivariate correlations were calculated between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods overall and by SARS-CoV-2 testing status. RESULTS: Of 5,239,692 patient admissions, there were 20,113 community-onset BSIs before the pandemic (11.2/1000 admissions) and 39,740 (11.5/1000 admissions) during the pandemic (P ≤ 0.0062). Corresponding rates of hospital-onset BSI were 2,771 (1.6/1000 admissions) and 6,864 (2.0/1000 admissions; P < 0.0062). Compared to the pre-pandemic period, rates of community-onset BSI were higher in patients who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 (15.8/1000 admissions), compared with 9.6/1000 BSI admissions among SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. Compared with patients in the pre-pandemic period, SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with community-onset BSI experienced greater ICU admission rates (36.6% vs 32.8%; P < 0.01), greater ventilator use (10.7% vs 4.7%; P < 0.001), and longer LOS (12.2 d vs 9.1 d; P < 0.001). Rates of hospital-onset BSI were higher in the pandemic vs the pre-pandemic period (2.0 vs 1.5/1000; P < 0.001), with rates as high a 7.3/1000 admissions among SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with hospital-onset BSI had higher rates of ICU admission (72.9% vs 55.4%; P < 0.001), LOS (34.8 d vs 25.5 d; P < 0.001), and ventilator use (52.9% vs 21.5%; P < 0.001). Enterococcus species, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Candida albicans were more frequently detected in the pandemic period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This nationally representative study found an increased risk of both community-onset and hospital-onset BSI during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic period, with the largest increased risk in hospital-onset BSI among SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. SARS-CoV-2 positivity was associated with worse outcomes.

Skin problems among nurses due to personal protective equipment: A cross-sectional study from COVID-19 hospital

BACKGROUND: Nursing staff are at much greater risk of infection due to the exposure to the highly infectious bodily fluids and droplet nuclei and needed the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to reduce the transmission risk. AIM: The present study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of skin injury and its type due to PPE usage nursing staff. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted after obtaining the institutional ethical approval in dedicated COVID-19 hospital for a period of 4 months among 144 nursing staff wearing Grade 2 and 3 PPE kit. Study subjects were approached through social networking websites and survey questionnaire (Google Forms) according to relevant guides;research literature was used for collecting the details regarding baseline, duty, and skin injury characterization. Chi-square analysis was used to find the association between dependent and independent variables and an association was significant for P < 0.05. RESULTS: It was observed that 54.7% of nursing staff were working for 6 or more hours and 16.5% of subjects were wearing the PPE kit for 5 or more hours per day. 86.3% of subjects have suffered from skin injury after PPE usage. The most common symptoms/signs for the skin injury occurred were indentation and pain on back of ears (61.9%). CONCLUSION: The skin injuries of PPE among the nursing staff may result in reduced morale for overloaded work and made them anxious, so an effective preventive measure should be adopted. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Indian Journal of Health Sciences & Biomedical Research is the property of Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

HOW the tourism & hospitality lecturers coped with the transition to online teaching due to COVID-19: An assessment of stressors, negative sentiments & coping strategies.

This study identified stressors and relevant coping strategies used by the hospitality & tourism lectures (N = 369) during Covid-19 around the globe. It also intended to reveal how intensely the coping strategies of Brief-COPE scale contribute to forecasting the significant positive and negative result constructs. Stressors and coping strategies were measured by grouping them into -avoidant and approach coping. Results of correlations found that significant positive emotional results (well-being, resilience, post-traumatic growth, happiness, and health) linked negatively with avoidant coping and positively with approach coping. However, avoidant coping was found to be constantly associated with negative results (stress, frustration, anxiety, etc.).

Weaning Outcomes and 28-day Mortality after Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Patients in Central India: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy is integral in long-term intensive care of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients. There is a paucity of studies on weaning outcomes and mortality after tracheostomy in COVID-19 in Indian scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center, observational study of severe COVID-19 patients who underwent elective tracheostomy (n = 65) during critical care in a tertiary care institute in Central India from May 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021. Data were collected from Medical records, ICU charts, and follow-up visits by patient. A primary objective was to study the clinical characteristics, tracheostomy complications, weaning outcomes, and mortality at 28 and 60 days of ICU admission. We categorized the cohort into two groups (deceased and survivor) and studied association of clinical parameters with 28-day mortality. Cox Proportional regression analysis was applied to calculate the hazard ratio among the predictors of mortality with p value <0.05 as significant. RESULTS: Elective tracheostomy was done in 69 of 436 (15.8%) patients on invasive mechanical ventilation, of which 65 were included. Tracheostomy was percutaneous in 45/65 (69%) and surgical in 20/65 (31%) with timing from intubation as early in 41/65 and late in 24/65 with most common indication as weaning failure followed by anticipated prolonged ventilation. Tracheostomy complications were present in 29/65 (45%) patients with no difference in complication rates between timing and type of tracheostomy. Downsizing, decannulation, and weaning were successful in 22%, 32 (49%), and 35/65 (54%) patients after tracheostomy. The 28-day mortality was 30/65 (46%). The fractional inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) requirement in survivors was lower (0.4-0.6, p = 0.015) with a higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio (118-200, p = 0.033). Early tracheostomy within 7 days of intubation was not associated with weaning or survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that tracheostomy should be delayed to after 7 days of intubation, especially till FiO2 reduces to 0.5 with improvement in PaO2/FiO2 for better outcomes and avoiding a wasted procedure (CTRI/2021/07/034768). STUDY HIGHLIGHTS: Tracheostomy is integral in care of COVID-19 patients needing prolonged ventilation. There is no difference in complications in early/late or percutaneous dilatational/surgical technique. We observed successful weaning post-tracheostomy in 54% patients. Mortality at 28 days was 46%. Early tracheostomy within 7 days of intubation did not improve weaning or survival. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Karna ST, Trivedi S, Singh P, Khurana A, Gouroumourty R, Dodda B, et al. Weaning Outcomes and 28-day Mortality after Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Patients in Central India: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(1):85-93.

Medical student's preference of educational resource usage during COVID-19 pandemic from Northern India

Introduction: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) posed an extraordinary situation in front of humankind with the onset of the year 2020. The Government of India, on March 16, 2020, announced closure of all the educational institutions. The aim of this study was to investigate the accessible and preferable educational resources among medical students during this pandemic phase. Materials and Methods: This web-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 392 undergraduate medical students after obtaining informed consent using a structured questionnaire with close-ended responses. Existence of clustering within the student's preferred educational resources was investigated. Results: The mean age of the study participants was 20.71 ± 1.65, with 51.3% males and 48.7% females. The major responses regarding educational resources were online lectures, online teaching videos, reading textbooks, and written notes. Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed preference for online lectures, online teaching videos, interactive online materials, and medical apps. Conclusion: As the count of users for educational resources available over the Internet is uprising, now, it is vital to generate evidence-based systems which support teaching merits and provide guidance for efficient teaching material available for online learning.